Selden (2009) observes that there is a need to recruit people
who are not only talented but who are ethical, accountable and loyal to the
public interest. This raises the third possible solution to the competency
challenge: the role of the Millennials: Millennials add value to the work place
– they are great at multitasking, willing to make themselves available after hours
and weekends are tech savvy, adept with social media and willing to speak their
minds. Moreover, there is an increasing amount of literature out there that
holds the view that Millennials actually like working for and favor the public
sector. In a July 2010 report, commissioned by the Center for American
Progress, Guy Molyneux and Ruy Teixeira find that a majority of Millennials are
more likely to support political candidates who favor increasing government
efficiency, effectiveness and performance. See report here: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/public-opinion/report/2010/07/27/8078/the-generation-gap-on-government/
It was strong
support from this very group that helped Barack Obama to win the White House in
2008. The study notes that 62 % of Millennials versus 46 % of non-Millennials
favor a strong government whilst about 50 % share a favorable opinion of the
federal government compared to just 30 % of nonMillennials who do not. It
appears that this group strongly supports improving work force performance by
reform of the federal government’s hiring and firing practices. They also favor
modernizing technology systems for better service outcomes and applying the
best private-sector management practices in order to improve government
performance. This generation seems genuinely interested in solving big
problems, assuming leadership responsibility and building a better future for
their communities and the world. Young employees today are more mobile and are
more loyal to people than employers. They are far more demanding of their
employers than previous generations. It will be a great challenge for HRM
systems to keep the most talented ones. Takeaway from this report: These two
factors along with their strong support for performance-based policy decisions
may in fact be the next critical step towards governmental meritocracy and
bridging the generation gap. Millennials will be the next major generational
group to” invade” the workplace. They may in fact “hold the key to a new era of
public confidence in government”.Only time will tell.
Hannam and Yordi:”Successful integration of the four generations can
lead to a stronger organization. Each generation can bring different sets of
skills and life experiences to the workplace. Studies show that the successful
integration of the four generations can also increase innovation and improve
productivity if properly managed.”
Conclusion
This is the first time in the
history of the modern workforce that so many generations have worked side by
side. Many employees today find that they are working closely both with people
who are as young as their children and as old as their parents .To manage this
diverse workforce it is imperative that
government leaders and HR
administrators understand the mind-sets of different generations and how each
group perceives the world – based on their experience. Administrators need to
create a culture that draws in the younger ones and retains
and motivates the older ones. There needs to be a platform
where knowledge-sharing can happen. Most managers see intergenerational
diversity as an asset. “Managers are realizing that age has just as much to do
with employees’ hopes, learning styles and expectations as do culture, gender
and other characteristics. By understanding each generation and by giving
employees what they need to thrive, managers can do much to improve
productivity and morale “[Kogan M, 2001). Selden observes that “Workforce
planning is the process of identifying the positions, skills, and competencies
that will be required in the future. The goal behind workforce planning is to
place the right people in the right jobs at the right times, so that
[government] agencies can accomplish their missions” [Selden S, 2009]. By
engaging in proper workforce planning government agencies will find it a lot
easier to bridge the generation gap.
Hannam and Yordi:” Taking full advantage of the
multi-generational workforce will enable employers to effectively attract and
retain employees, build teams, and deal with change and increase employee
engagement”.
Selden [Selden S, 2009] defines Human
Capital Management (HCM) as the systems, policies, procedures, and
practices of managing human capital within public organizations, whether merit
or non-merit systems, civil or non-civil services. Ultimately the primary goal of
an effective HCM system is to create a performance-aligned workforce utilizing
human capital management systems, policies, procedures and practices, and more
importantly, the latter must be aligned with the agency’s mission. Governments
therefore should see the generational changes not as a crisis but as an
opportunity to implement meaningful change by building a competent workforce.
References
Berman, E., Bowman, J., West, J., &
Van Wart, M. [2013]. Human Resource Management in Public Service. Los Angeles:
Sage Publications, Inc.
Selden, S. [2009]. Human Capital. Tools
and Strategies for the Public Sector. Washington: CQ Press.
Koppell,
D. (2011, November 11). Gen-Y versus Boomers. Workplace conflict heats up.
Retrieved from http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2011/11/11/Gen-Y-vs-Boomers-Workplace-Conflict-Heats-Up.aspx#page1
Miller,
S. (2010, October 8).Baby Boomers Will Transform Aging, Work, and Retirement.
Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/benefits/Articles/Pages/Boomersretirement.aspx
Peck. (2008, September 28).America’s
$320 Billion Shadow Government. Retrieved from http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2011/09/28/Americas-320-Billion-Shadow-Government.aspx#page1
Kogan,
M. (2001, August 31). Federal managers work to bridge workplace generation gap.
Retrieved from http://www.govexec.com/federal-news/2001/08/federal-managers-work-to-bridge-workplace-generation-gap/9879/
Gerber.
(2013, July 29). Baby Boomers in the Workplace. Retrieved from http://seniors.lovetoknow.com/Baby_Boomers_in_the_Workplace
Population
Reference Bureau labor statistics retrieved from http://www.prb.org/
Bureau
of Labor Statistics retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/bls/unemployment.htm
Society
For Human Resource Management (SHRM) statistics retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/Pages/default.aspx
Clark.
(2010, May 6). Retiring Baby Boomers Impact on the Workplace. Retrieved from http://drbruceclark.com/?p=278
Gallagher.
(2005, February 21).Retirement of baby boomers may reverberate in workplace.
Retrieved from http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2002185894_boomers21.html
Hannam,
S,Yordi B. Engaging a Multi-Generational Workforce: Practical Advice for
Government Managers. Retrieved from http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/Engaging%20a%20Multi-Generational%20Workforce.pdf